Vasanthakumari v. Manoharan
Case brief
What is this about?
The matrimonial appeal was dismissed on the petitioners' counsel submitting that it was not pressed, recorded by the Court without detailed reasoning.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/16TH ASWINA 1934
Mat.Appeal.No. 402 of 2011 ( )
OP.1408/2009 of FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD
APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER.:
VASANTHAKUMARI, D/O.DHARMARAJAN, ALUVILA VEEDU, THOTTACKADU DESOM, MANAMBOOR CHIRAYINKEEZHU.
BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
MANOHARAN, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, THUMBADI THALACKAL VEEDU,AYILAM, MUDHAKKAL CHIRAYINKEEZHU-695 304.
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-102012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
VANTHAKUMARI, D/O.DHARMARAJAN, ALUVILA VEEDU, THOTTACKADU DESOM, MANAMBOOR CHIRAYINKEEZHU
- respondent
MANOHARAN, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, THUMBADI THALACKAL VEEDU,AYILAM, MUDHAKKAL CHIRAYINKEEZHU-695 304
Coram
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court