Abdul Gafoor v. v.a.Thomas
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition challenging the execution court's order on restoration of status quo ante. The High Court held that pipes running from exterior to interior through holes drilled in walls constituted prohibited alterations and must be removed, modifying the lower court's order to ensure full compliance.
What did the court decide?
The impugned order modified to direct removal of all pipelines drawn through holes drilled in walls and sealing of such holes within two weeks.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/6TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
CRP.No. 511 of 2012 () ---------------------EP.NO.453/2010 IN OS.787/1998 of PRL.M.C.,ERNAKULAM
REVISION PETITIONER(S):
ABDUL GAFOOR CC 41/2806, OPP.TOWN HALL ERNAKULAM VILLAGE KANAYANNUR TALUK ALSO HAVING ADDRESS AT BIMBIS JOSE JUNCTION NEAR M.G.ROAD, COCHIN-682016.
BY ADVS.SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY SRI.G.HARIKRISHNAN (TRIPUNITHURA)
RESPONDENT(S): --------------
V.A THOMAS S/O.LATE VELUKARAN ANTONY, VELUKARAN HOUSE ST.VINCENT ROAD, NOW RESIDING AT VELUKARAN HOUSE CHAKKUNGAL ROAD, PALARIVATTOM ROAD, COCHIN-682025.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.P.RAMNATH(CAVEATOR)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether drawing pipelines through holes drilled in walls of the tenant amount to alterations prohibited by the decree.
Whether the lower court erred in directing only the removal of internal pipes without ordering removal of pipes running from exterior to interior through the walls.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ABDUL GAFOOR
- respondent
V.A THOMAS
Coram
V. CHITAMBARESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court