This is a one-line order. The matter was reported as settled between parties, rendering the Civil Revision Petition unnecessary and infructuous, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/22ND BHADRA 1934
CRP.No. 236 of 2009 ( )
E.P. NO. 46/2006 IN OS.74/2004 of MUSNIFF COURT,ADOOR
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/DECREE HOLDER:
VIJAYA RAJAN PILLAI, S/O.JANARDANAN PILLAI, CHERUPAZHANJIYIL VEEDU VADEKKE MURI, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR SRI.C.R.REGHUNATHAN SRI.M.V.ASHIM
RESPONDENT(S)/JUDGEMENT DEBTORS:
1. PARUKUTTY AMMA, D/O.NANIAMMA, KOICKKALAZHIKATHU VEEDU, KADAMPANADU VADAKKE MURI KADAMPANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
2. SASIDHARAN PILLAI, KOICKKALAZHIKATHU
3. PONNAMMA, KOICKKALAZHIKATHU VEEDU,
4. REJANI, KOICKKALAZHIKATHU VEEDU,
5. RENJINI, KOICKKALAZHIKATHU VEEDU, KADAMPANADU VADAKKE MURI, KADAMPANADU VILLAGE ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ BY ADV. SRI.SAJJU.S
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-09-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
tss
V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
= = = = = = = = = = =
C.R.P No.236 of 2009
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = =
Dated this the 13th day of September, 2012
O R D E R
It is reported that the matter has been settled between the
parties. The Civil Revision Petition has become unnecessary therefore. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
V.CHITAMBARESH. JUDGE
smm
2
Vijaya Rajan Pillai
Parukutty Amma
Sasidharan Pillai
Ponnamma
Rejani
Renjini
V.Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
