Janardhanan v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court confirmed the conviction for cheque dishonour under Section 138 NI Act. After analyzing evidence showing the cheque lack of documentation regarding the loan, the court upheld the guilty verdict. It granted the petitioner three months to pay the compensation amount to avoid imprisonment, suspending any warrant issued.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted three months to pay compensation of Rs.1,05,000/-; warrant kept in abeyance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/25TH MAGHA 1933
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 186 of 2012 (C)
.NO./ IN CRA.569/2010 of THE SESSIONS COURT, ALAPPUZHA .NO./ IN CC.769/2007 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT,AMBALAPUZHA
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/COMPLAINANT:
JANARDHANAN, AMPATHIL CHIRA VEEDU, KAKKAZHAM P.O., AMBALAPUZHA,ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SUDHEENDRAN
COMPLAINANT(S)/ACCUSED:
1. STATE OF KERALA,
- REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be upheld and sentence modified.
Whether the revision petitioner is entitled to an extension of time to pay the awarded compensation.
Whether the evidence supports the conclusion that the cheque was issued to discharge a specific liability.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Janardhanan
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
Minimon.D
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court