Kunhiraman v. Mammu
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court allowed the criminal revision petition, setting aside the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and granted acquittal to the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Conviction and sentence set aside; petitioner stands acquitted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/24TH MAGHA 1933 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 294 of 2012 ( ) ------------------------------CRA.283/2000 of SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKODE (ADDL. II) ST.1272/1998 of J.M.F.C.I,NADAPURAM
REVISION PETITIONER: --------------------
KUNHIRAMAN S/O.KANNAN @ KANARAN AGED 58 YEARS PALLIYARAKKAL HOUSE MARUTHONKARA P.O. KAVILUMPARA (Via) KOZHIKODE DISTRICT
BY ADVS.SRI.C.VALSALAN SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN SMT.THUSHARA.V
COMPLAINANTS:
--------------1. MAMMU S/O.KUNHAVULLA AGED 66 YEARS KUNINDANTAVIDA HOUSE VALAYAM AMSOM DESOM VALAYAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 103
2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA COCHIN-682 031
R1 BY ADV. SMT.P.A.ANEESHA R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SEENA RAMAKRISHNAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the criminal revision petition and set aside the conviction and sentence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kunhirman
- respondent
Mammu
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court