Protest complaint. Earlier, a complaint was filed before the learned Magistrate by the 2nd respondent. After taking his statement on oath and on perusing the documents, the court forwarded the same for police investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A crime was then registered and after completing the investigation a final report has been laid before the learned Magistrate. Evidently, it was a a refer report. Thereupon, the 2nd respondent filed the protest complaint and upon that complaint cognizance was taken by the learned Magistrate of offences under Sections 417, 423, 465, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the revision petitioners. It was taken on file as C.C.No. 774 of 2011 and ordered to issue summons to the revision petitioners. Along with the revision petition the petitioners have produced certain documents besides the police report, protest complaint etc; and contended that such documents would reveal that the properties belonging to the petitioners and the complainant are distinct and different. I do not propose to look in to such unmarked materials produced by the petitioners at this preliminary stage in exercise of the revisional powers. I am of the considered view
