the institution of marriage. Indubitably, marriage as a social institution is considered solemn and sacred all over the civilized word and therefore, courts have and owe a duty to redeem the parties from volatile and vulnerable situations like the one on hand. There is yet another aspect as well. The invaluable time of the court has to be saved whenever and wherever it is possible and compelling parties to continue to prosecute the case, the continuation of which has become unnecessary would certainly end in futility. In a case of this nature, in view of the reconciliation there is not even a remote possibility of the defacto complainant deposing against the accused with a view to fetch him a conviction. I have no hesitation to say, in the totality circumstances, that allowing continuance of the proceedings based on Crime No. 478/2011 of Payyoli Police Station any further would result in miscarriage of justice and also would result in abuse of process of Court. In this case, it is to be noted, earlier, even in Crl. M.C. No. 4453/2011, the revision petitioner herein/defacto complainant, filed an
