vehicle and avoided the prosecution. Learned public prosecutor further submits that it was in view of the fact that the petitioner volunteered to compound the offence and because he remitted the amount as compounding fee further proceedings in Crime No.103/2007 was dropped and as such now the petitioner cannot turn round and contended that the amount happened to be paid by the petitioner since the S.I intimidated the driver of the petitioner to pay Rs.25,000/- for the purpose of releasing the lorry. Having adopted one posture by the petitioner he cannot now wriggle and turn round and contend that he was not liable to pay the amount. Had the petitioner any ground to challenge the seizure of the vehicle or seizure of the sand, that was a matter to be done by the petitioner at the proper time through appropriate means. But the petitioner chose to have an order of disposal of the matter by submitting himself to have composition of the offence. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be now allowed to contend that the amount paid by him as
