U.Narayana Shetty v. Shahul Hameed
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a criminal appeal for non-prosecution. The single-judge bench noted that despite multiple adjournments over nine years, the appellant failed to serve notice on respondents or pursue the matter, deeming further time meaningless.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/21ST BHADRA 1934
CRL.A.No. 800 of 2003
[AGAINST THE ORDER DTD.15.3.2003 IN
CC.514/1999 of THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,KASARAGOD]
APPELLANT(S)/COMPLAINANT:
------------------------U.NARAYANA SHETTY, S/O.LATE DEEMANNA SHETTY, RESIDING AT SHEETHAL, KODIBAIL VILLAGE, POST UPPALA OF KASARAGOD TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN
RESPONDENTS(S):
- SHAHUL HAMEED, S/O.PATLA MOHAMMED, MANAGING PARTNER M/S.RAHATH, NELLIKKAI ROAD, BUNDER, BANGALORE-1, D.K.DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
What shall be the consequence of inordinate delay by the appellant in serving notice on respondents and pursuing the appeal?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
U.Narayana Shetty
- respondent
Shahul Hameed
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court