This is a contempt case decided on the day of admission. The court observed that the impugned order from the Devaswom Commissioner complied with the direction issued by this court regarding the petitioner's appeal for transfer. No further action was necessary.
The contempt case is closed as the direction was complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2012/22ND ASHADHA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 897 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/2784/2012
PETITIONER(S):
S.SUNITHA KUMARI, KAZHAKAM, UMMANNOR DEVASWOM POLIKODE SUB GROUP KOTTARAKKARA GROUP R/A.CHANDRODAYAM PUTHUVAKKAL KILLY,KOLLODU P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
BY ADV. SRI.SASITH PANICKER
RESPONDENT(S):
SECRETARY C.R.ANITHA, NOW WORKING AS THE SECRETARY TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY SRI.G.BIJU,SC,TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 897 of 2012 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE:
ANNEXURE A1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 2.1.2021 IN W.P. (C). NO.2784/2012 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
ANNEXURE A2 (a1): COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT.
ANNEXURE A2(a2) : COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD SEND BY THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE: NIL.
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE.
KP
K.SURENDRA MOHAN,J.
Cont.Case(C).No.897 of 2012
Dated this the 13th day of July, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Shri G. Biju, the learned standing counsel for the respondent has handed over to me today a copy of proceedings No.R.O.C.8460/11/Mis.C. dtd 02.07.2012 of the Devaswom Commissioner, issued after considering the entitlement of the petitioner to be granted the transfer that was sought for. According to the counsel, the petitioner's appeal had been considered earlier and her request was directed to be considered at the time of General Transfer for the year 2012-13. Accordingly the matter has been considered again and the present proceedings dated 02.07.2012 has been issued.
Since the direction issued by this Court has been complied with as noticed above, no further action is necessary to be initiated in this contempt case. The same is accordingly closed.
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE
kkj
S.SUNITHA KUMARI
SECRETARY C.R.ANITHA
K.SURENDRA MOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
