In a contempt of court case filed to review compliance with directions in an earlier writ petition, the High Court at Ernakulam held that both sides agreed the directions had been complied with and thus closed the current contempt case without a detailed order.
Case closed as n.m.c of directions was admitted by both sides.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/27TH ASWINA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 840 of 2011 (S)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN RP.NO.1151/2010 DATED 22-12-2010
PETITIONER(S)/REVIEW PETITIONERS:
1. V.A.SOBHANAKUMARI, AGED 59, W/O.P.SASIDHARAN, FINANCE OFFICER (RETIRED),KSEB PANACHIYIL HOUSE, PALLITHAZHAM, MULANTHURUTHY P.O. ERNAKULAM.
2. KUMARI PAUL, AGED 59,
3. P.KANAKAMMA, AGED 60,W/O.M.K.VIJAYAN, SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT (RETIRED), KSEB THAIPPARAMBIL HOUSE, THEKKUMBHAGOM, THIRUPPUNITHURA-682 301.
4. P.VILASINI AMMA, AGED 60, W/O.K.K.BHASKARAN NAIR SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT (RETIRED), KSEB, PARASATHY SNRA-63, SASTHRI NAGAR, MARADU P.O. ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.N.SUGATHAN SMT.M.C.BINDUMOL
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
1. SMT.ROOPAKALA JAGATH, SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM PALACE.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
MJL
Con.Case(C).No. 840 of 2011 (S)
2. SHRI.ABDULRAHIMAN SAIT, CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KSE BOARD, PATTOM PALACE P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
(RESPONDENTS AGE AND FATHER'S NAME ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
BY ADV.SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MJL
Con.Case(C).No. 840 of 2011 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:
| ANNEXURE I | : | TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 17-11-2009 IN W.P.(C) NO.18237/2008 |
|---|---|---|
| ANNEXURE II | : | CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DATED 22-12-2010 IN R.P.NO.1151/2010 |
| ANNEXURE III | : | COPY OF LETTER DATED 7-3-2011 OF THE COUNSEL ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH THE SURETY BOND |
| ANNEXURE IV | : | COPY OF LAWYER'S NOTICE DATED 16-6-2011 ADDRESSSED TO THE RESPONDENTS. |
| ANNEXURE V | : | COPY OF ORDER DATED 24-5-2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. |
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P A TO JUDGE
MJL
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
Contempt Case (C).No. 840 of 2012
==================
Dated this the 19th day of October, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Both sides agree that the directions in Annexure I judgment
have been complied with. Accordingly, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
sdk+
S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
V.A.SOBHANAKUMARI AND OTHERS
SMT.ROOPAKALA JAGATH AND OTHERS
S. SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
