The petitioner filed a contempt case after the record of a writ petition. Both parties agreed that the directions in the impugned judgment had been complied with, and the court closed the case.
The contempt case was closed having both sides agreed to compliance with previous directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/27TH ASWINA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 1505 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/8732/2012 -------------------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN IA.NO.11501/2012 IN WPC.8732/2012 DATED 21-08-2012
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:
1. BABEESH
S/O.BHASKARAN, ERANGHIKKATTU, P.O.PUTHIYANGADI PAVANGOD, PUTHUR, CALICUT PIN 673021.
2. SUBITH B.S., AGED 25 YEARS S/O.SOMAN, B.S.BHAVAN, KAKKODI P.O. KOZHIKODE-673611.
3. SHAFEEL.K.U.,, AGED 26 YEARS S/O.UMMER, 1179A "NASEEB", P.O.G.A. COLLEGE KULANGARAPEEDIKA, CALICUT-14.
4. VINU KODAKKAT, AGED 24 YEARS S/O.BALAN, MECHILERI MEETHIL HOUSE KOZHUKKALLUR P.O., MEPPAYYUR, CALICUT PIN 673524.
5. ANISH AUGUSTINE, AGED 29 YEARS S/O.AUGUSTINE, MACHUKUZHIYIL, CHEMPUKADAVE.P.O. KODANCHERRY, KOZHIKODE, PIN 673580.
BY ADV. SRI.NIRMAL. S
RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C):
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SIDCO THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (SIDCO), P.B.NO.50, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Contempt Case (C).No. 1505/12
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
Annexure A1. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).No. 8732/12.
sdk+
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
Contempt Case (C).No. 1505 of 2012
==================
Dated this the 19th day of October, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Both sides agree that the directions in Annexure A1 judgment have been complied with. Accordingly, this contempt
case is closed.
Sd/-
sdk+
S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
BABEESH ORS.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SIDCO
S.SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
