This is a contempt of court case regarding alleged non-compliance with a direction dated 4.10.2011 in WP(C) No.26455/2011. The Court found that the respondent had complied with the order and dismissed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/17TH PHALGUNA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 82 of 2012 (S)
[THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.26455/2011 DATED 04-10-2011]
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
PRATHEESH KUMAR V.V, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN NAMBIAR, AGED 29 YEARS, VELUR VADAKKUMURI HOUSE, THIRUMTTAKKODE P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, (REGISTERED OWNER OF KL-08/E-6174).
BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS.
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
M.ANIL KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE/REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR-680 003.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. LILLY.K.T.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE (C) .NO.82/2012-S:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:-
ANNEXURE A: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.26455/2011-F DTD. 04/10/11 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE B: COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DTD. 13/10/11 ISSUED TO PETITIONER.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Prv.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON,J.
= = = = = = = = = = Cont.Case (Civil) No.82 of 2012
= = = = = = = == = = = = = Dated this the 7th day of March, 2012
J U D G M E N T
The grievance is with regard to non-compliance of the directions given by this Court as per judgment dated 4-102011 in W.P(C) No.26455/2011.
Cont.Case (Civil) No.82 of 2012 2
place of confiscation, by remitting the said amount with fine as specified.
accordingly.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON . JUDGE
smm
Cont.Case (Civil) No.82 of 2012 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the directions given by this Court in the earlier judgment were complied with by the respondent.
Whether a contempt of court case should be dismissed in the face of compliance with earlier directions.
Pratheesh Kumar V.V
M.Anil Kumar
P.R.Ramachandran Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
