Clementina v. D.K.Mittal
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt of court case where both parties submitted that the impugned judgment had been complied with. The court recorded the submission and closed the case on the same day.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2012/22ND ASHADHA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 747 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/4351/2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.4351/2011 DATED 08-03-2011
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
CLEMENTINA K..A, W/O. CHACKO, PALLIPPADAN HOUSE, KANJOOR P.O. ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN
SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SMT.D.S.THUSHARA
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT :
D.K.MITTAL
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
CLEMENTINA K..A, W/O. CHACKO
- respondent
D.K.MITTAL
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court