In a contempt case regarding non-compliance with a W.P. judgment, the respondent produced an order in favor of the petitioner, leading the court to close the contempt proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2012/3RD JYAISHTA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 620 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/8723/2009
(NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE JUDGMENT DATED 16-11-2011 IN WPC.8723/2009 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER(S) :
C.A.AJITH, AGED 26 YEARS, SON OF ANNALAKUTTY, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MATHS), A.M.HIGH SCHOOL, VENGOOR P.O., VENGOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA
RESPONDENT(S)/4TH RESPONDENT :
SRI.K.K.MONUDEEN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, WANDOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 328.
BY SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-05-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AMV
Con.Case(C).No. 620 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/8723/2009
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE I : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C) NO.8723 OF 2009-I DATED 16.11.2011.
ANNEXURE II : COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K.DIS.66/2012/C DATED 09.01.2012. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES : NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
AMV
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
----------------------------------------Contempt Case (C) No.620 OF 2012 -----------------------------------------Dated this the 24th day of May, 2012.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner alleges non compliance of the directions
issued in Annexure I judgment.
learned Government Pleader.
Learned Government Pleader produced before me for perusal order No.A4/8046/11 dated 16.05.2012. It is seen that the competent authority has passed the order which is in favour
of the petitioner.
Therefore, the Contempt Case is closed.
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE
smp
C.A. Ajith
Sri. K.K. Monudeen
T.R. Ramachandran Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
