Petitioner moved a contempt case challenging compliance with a prior judgment. The court found that the petitioner had complied with the directions in the impugned judgment before the case was admitted. The matter was closed with no punishment imposed.
Contempt case closed upon recording of compliance with the impugned judgment directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/15TH JYAISHTA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 526 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/2377/2011
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN .NO./ IN WPC.2377/2011 DATED 05-07-2011
PETITIONER(S):
SABIRA K., AGED 28 YEARS, D/O.HUSSAIN HAJEE, KIZHAKKEYIL HOUSE KOZHI MANNA (VIA), THAVANOOR P.O., MALAPPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.AUGUSTINE JOSEPH SRI.K.S.ROCKEY
RESPONDENT(S):
SIVASANKAR AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER NOW WORKING AS THE SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-06-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
LSN
Con.Case(C).No. 526 of 2012 (S)
ANNEXURE
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE:
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
LSN
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
Contempt of Court Case No.526/2012-S
Dated this the 5th day of June, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directions issued
in Annexure-I Judgment have been complied after the filing of the
Contempt of Court Case. Recording the same, the Contempt of Court Case
is closed.
Sd/-
(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)
ms
SABIRA K.
SIVASANKAR AGE
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court