P.Padmanabhan v. P.Dileep Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ of contempt was closed as not maintainable due to an existing stay against enforcement of the interim order challenged in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/24TH MAGHA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 1328 of 2010 (S) --------------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC.26269/2009 DATED 09/11/2009
PETITIONER(S):/ PETITIONERS
1. P.PADMANABHAN, S/O.GOVINDAN, AGED 60 YEARS, PADMA NIVAS, URUVACHAL P.O., MATTANNUR VIA KANNUR DISTRICT.
2. N.SNIGDHA, W/O.NAVEEN, AGED 40 YEARS, VIJAYA NIVAS, NEAR S.K.TEMPLE, KOZHIKODE REP.BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, P.PADMANABHAN RESIDING PADMA NIVAS, URUVACHAL P.O., MATTANNUR VIA KANNUR.
3. E.A.NEETHA, W/O.PADMANABHAN, AGED 38 YEARS, PADMA NIVAS, URUVACHAL P.O., MATTANNUR VIA KANNUR.
4. A.P.SANDEEP, S/O.PADMANABHAN, AGED 30 YEARS, PADMA NIVAS, URUVACHAL P.O., MATTANNUR VIA KANNUR DISTRICT, REP.BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER P.PADMANABHAN, PADMA NIVAS, URUVACHAL P.O. MATTANNUR VIA, KANNUR.
BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):/ RESPONDENTS 1 & 3
1. P.DILEEP KUMAR, (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KANNUR, PIN - 695 008. * 2. P.M.BENNY, (AGE AND FATHERS NAME (CORRECTED) NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THALASSERY TALUK RUBBER & AGRICULTURAL MARKERTING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., IRITTY P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
*** ADDRESS OF RESPONDENT NO.2 IS CORRECTED AS P.M.BENNY, SECRETARY, THALASSERY TALUK RUBBER AND AGRICULTURAL MARKETING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., IRITTY.P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT; AS PER ORDER DATED 16/08/2011 IN I.A.NO.482/2011.**
R2 BY SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN R1 BY MR.GEORGE MECHERIL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-02-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH, JJ.
COC No.1328 of 2010
Dated this the 13th day of February, 2012.
J U D G M E N T
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since there is stay against enforcement of the interim order, this Contempt of Court Case is not maintainable and
the same is closed.
Sd/(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)
Sd/(BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
jg
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE.
P. Padmanabhan
P. Dileep Kumar
C.N. Ramachandran Nair
Babu Mathew P. Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court