Vijayamma Pillai v. E.Noorudeen Kunju
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a contempt case arising from a writ petition regarding a 2011 judgment. The court noted that an earlier order had extended time for compliance with the directions, resulting in the dismissal of the contempt proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceedings closed due to extension of time for compliance granted in the underlying writ petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/23RD BHADRA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 1286 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/29158/2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.29158/2011 DATED 02-11-2011
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
VIJAYAMMA PILLAI, AGED 70 YEARS W/O. KARUNAKARAN NAIR MUNDAPALLY VEEDU, PONNEZHA, THEKKEKARA.P.O MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA - 690 107.
BY ADV. SRI.B.HARISH KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:
E.NOORUDEEN KUNJU TALUK LAND BOARD CHAIRMAN/REVENUE DIVISONAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TALUK LAND BOARD/REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER CHENGANNOOR.P.O, ALAPPUZHA - 689 121.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER P.A.REZIYA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VIJAYAMMA PILLAI
- respondent
E.NOORUDEEN KUNJU
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court