In this contempt proceedings filed for non-compliance with a judgment dated 16.2.2012, the High Court closed the case after finding that the respondent complied with the court's directions via proceedings dated 23.7.2012.
Contempt proceedings closed; petitioner told to challenge proceedings separately if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2012/4TH SRAVANA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 1001 of 2012 (S) -------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.26562/2011 DATED 16-02-2012
PETITIONER:
P.A.POULOSE, AGED 61 YEARS, (SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT (RETIRED), S/O.ANTONY PUTHIYEDATH HOUSE, TIRA-29, UNICHIRA, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-21.
BY ADV. SRI.P.A.PAULOSE (PARTY - IN - PERSON)
RESPONDENT:
MAHALEKSHMI MENON, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E) INDIAN ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E) INDIAN ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E), KERALA M.G.ROAD, P.B.NO.5607, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695039.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI G.GOPAKUMAR
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1001 of 2012 (S)
A P P E N D I X
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE-A1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C) NO.26562 OF 2011. ANNEXURE-A2: TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 7.6.2012.
/TRUE COPY/
P.S TO JUDGE
rtr/
K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J.
Cont. Case NO: 1001 OF 2012
----------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 26th July, 2012.
JUDGMENT
The learned Govt. Pleader has handed over to me today proceedings dated 23-7-2012 issued by the respondent in compliance with the directions in the judgment dated 16-2-2012 of this Court. The petitioner is not satisfied with the said proceedings. It shall be open to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings separately, if he is aggrieved.
In view of the fact that the directions of this Court have been complied with, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge
jj /True copy/
P.S.to Judge
2
P.A. Poulose
Mahalekshmi Menon
K. Surendra Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
