Allowed

Sminu v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC7 Dec 2012Bail Appl./8328/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court allowed a bail application filed by Sminu, grantng bail subject to standard conditions including a bond, appearance before the Investigating Officer, passport submission, and not leaving the state.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; bail granted with conditions including bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties, appearance before Investigating Officer, and restrictions on departure from Kerala.

Sminu Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/16TH AGRAHAYANA 1934

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 8328 of 2012

¶6

CRIME NO.667/2012 OF KOTHAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM

¶7

CMP.2428/2012 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KOTHAMANGALAM

¶8

ACCUSED(S)/ACCUSED NO 11:

¶9

SMINU,, AGED 27 YEARS S/O SURENDRAN, VENNALCHIRA HOUSE, PULINTHANAM KARA ERANALLOOR VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT

¶10

BY ADV. SMT.RAJI T.BHASKAR

¶11

COMPLAINANT(S)/COMPLAINANT:

¶12

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESNETED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTHAMANGALAM THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH CORUT OF KERALA, KOCHI 682031

¶13

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.RASHEED.

¶14

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

stu

P.BHAVADASAN, J.

B.A. No.8328 of 2012

Dated this the 7^th day of December, 2012

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

In view of the order dated 1.11.2012 in B.A.No.8212 of 2012, there is no reason to deny bail to the petitioner in this case. Petition is accordingly allowed and the petitioner is granted bail subject to the following conditions:

¶21

a. The accused shall execute a bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. If in case the Magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned Magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties.

¶22

b. The accused shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and he should appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays and Fridays between 9.30 am to 11.30 am until further orders.

¶23

c. The accused shall produce his original passport before the learned Magistrate. If he is not having any valid passport, he should file an affidavit regarding the same before the Magistrate.

¶24

d. The accused will also file affidavit that he will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that he will not commit any offence

¶25

B.A. No.8328 of 2012 2

¶26

similar to the offence involved in this case and that he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶27

e. The accused shall not leave the State of Kerala without permission of the court.

¶28

f. The learned Magistrate will also ensure the identity of the sureties by insisting production of electoral photo identity cards/Driving licence etc.

¶29

P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE

¶30

cms

Sminu v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sminu v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niyas Mohammed Vs State of Kerala

Shaju Vs State of Kerala

Bijoy Vs Kerala State

Santhosh S. Vs State of Kerala

Milton N.J. Vs State of Kerala

Ramachandra Menon Vs State of Kerala