Manutty @ Sharafudhin v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a bail application by accused Nos. 2, 4 and 8 in a private complaint FIR alleging offences under sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 326, 395 and 452 IPC. The court granted bail subject to conditions regarding surrender, interrogation, bond execution, and movement restrictions.
What did the court decide?
The petitioners directed to surrender within 10 days; bail granted subject to execution of bond, interrogation conditions, and movement restrictions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/15TH JYAISHTA 1934
Bail Appl..No. 3030 of 2012 (C) -----------------------------CRIME NO.258 OF 2012 OF MANNARGHAT POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2,4 AND 8:
1. MANUTTY @ SHARAFUDHIN S/O.MUHAMMED, MALLIYIL HOUSE, CHENGALERY MANNARKADU, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2. RASHEED
- S/O.MUHAMMED, MALLIYIL HOUSE, CHENGALERY
- MANNARKADU, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
3. SIDHIQUE
- S/O.MUHAMMED, MALLIYIL HOUSE, CHENGALERY
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to accused Nos. 2, 4 and 8 charged under sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 326, 395 and 452 IPC r/w 34.
What conditions should be imposed on the bail to be granted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MANUTTY @ SHARAFUDHIN S/O.MUHAMMED, MALLIYIL HOUSE, CHENGALERY MANNARKADU, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- petitioner
RASHEED S/O.MUHAMMED, MALLIYIL HOUSE, CHENGALERY MANNARKADU, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- petitioner
SIDHIQUE S/O.MUHAMMED, MALLIYIL HOUSE, CHENGALERY MANNARKADU, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court