Dismissed
Ummusalma v. the State of Kerala
Kerala HCWP(C)/9137/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2011 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1933
WP(C).No. 9137 of 2011(N) ---------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
UMMUSALMA, D/O.MUHAMMED, AGED 55 YEARS, PARUTHIKUNNAN HOUSE, ATHRUSSERI, PLERUMANNA, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN
RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 025.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM-676 505.
3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 101.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALPAKANCHERRI POLICE STATION, KALPAKANCHERRI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 551.
5. P.MOIDEEN KUTTY, S/O.KUNHAHAMMED, PANGINIKKADAN HOUSE, PLERUMANNA, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 101.
R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) NO.9137/2011
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
P1:- COPY OF THE ROUGH SKETCH SHOWING THE LIE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER.
P2:- COPY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER.
P3:- COPY OF THE ORDER OF RDO, TIRUR DT.D 26.2.2011.
P4:- COPY OF THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
TRUE COPY
P.S. TO JUDGE
tss
R. BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
W.P.(C) No. 9137 of 2011-N
------------------------------------------------Dated this the 25th day of May, 2011
JUDGMENT
Basant,J.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order extending the period of Ext.P3 has not been obtained so far. If and when it is obtained and if police protection is then needed, the option of the petitioner to come to this Court again may be preserved and this petition may now be dismissed, it is submitted.
Sd/-
R. BASANT (Judge)
Sd/-
K. SURENDRA MOHAN (Judge)
Nan/
//true copy// P.S. to Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed because the petitioner failed to obtain the order extending the period of Ext.P3.
UMMUSALMA
STATE OF KERALA
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUR
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALPAKANCHERRI
P. MOIDEEN KUTTY
R. BASANT
K. SURENDRA MOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court