M.P.Varghese v. Dist.Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to bring the matter up for further proceedings despite a prior adjournment in February 2007.
The Kerala High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to bring the matter up for further proceedings despite a prior adjournment in February 2007.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
THURSDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2011 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1933
WP(C).No. 4667 of 2007(E)
-------------------------
PETITIONER:
M.P. VARGHESE, M/S.NEW INDIA BOREWELL SERVICES, VADAYARPADY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SABU THOZHUPPADAN
RESPONDENTS:
BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. P.N. SANTHOSH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
W.P.(C ) No. 4667 OF 2007
Dated this the 2nd June, 2011
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has approached this court with the following
prayers:
“i) issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ direction or order directing the respondents 1 and 2 to pay the balance bill amount payable to him as in Exhibit P4 with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of completion of the work ii) issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate order directing the 1st respondent to dispose Exhibit P5 on merit;
iii. Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court shall deem just in the facts and circumstances of the case.
first time in February, 2007, was adjourned on 06.03.2007. It
W.P.(C ) No. 4667 OF 2007
2
appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the cause of action projected in the writ petition, since no further steps were taken to bring up the matter. Today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
lk
M.P. Varghese
The District Collector, Civil Station, Kakkanadu
The District Officer, Ground Water Department, Kakkanadu
P.R. Ramachandra Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court