Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with the court granting liberty to file a fresh writ petition. The order is a one-line disposal with no substantive reasoning.
Liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932
WP(C).No. 2405 of 2011(A) ------------------------PETITIONER(S): ---------------
KANNIL KUMAR, AGED 56 YEARS, S/.NAMBI REDDIAR, PROPRIETOR, HOTEL ABHIRAMI, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN-682 025.
BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------
SC FOR KSHB SRI. AZ. JAYASANKAR BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. N. SANTHOSH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
8.2.2011. Sd/-ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.
//true copy// P.S to Judge.
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.2405 OF 2011(A)
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011
JUDGMENT
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
Sd/-ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.
//true copy//
P.S to Judge.
KANNIL KUMAR
STATE OF KERALA
KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
