P.O.Thomas and Another v. Land Revenue Commissioner and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala closed the writ petition filed by landowners seeking protection against dispossession, noting that the revisions filed by government authorities were irregular, unsigned, lacked court fees, and were returned, disposing of the matter without examining the impugned orders.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition is closed; petitioner directed to file proper revision petitions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932
WP(C).No. 2150 of 2011(P)
--------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
1. P.O.THOMAS, S/O.OUSEPH, PANAYAKKUNNEL HOUSE, B.L.RAMKARA, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK.
2. MARYKUTTY W/O P.O.THOMAS, PANAYAKKUNNEL HOUSE, B.L.RAM KARA, CHINNKKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S):
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be closed as the revenue revisions filed were found to be irregular and returned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.O.THO MAS
- petitioner
MARYKUTTY
- respondent
LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER
- respondent
DISTRICT COLLECTOR
- respondent
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court