E.a.James @ E.a.Varkey v. Biju Xaviour
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner, declaring it infructuous. The order was delivered on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
WP(C).No. 2082 of 2006(W) -------------------------
PETITIONER(S): ---------------
E.A.JAMES @ E.A.VARKEY, EATTIKKAL HOUSE, MUNDAKAYAM P.O., ERUMELY NORTH VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SMT.RESHMI POULOSE
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------
1. BIJU XAVIOUR, EATTIKKAL HOUSE, MUNDAKAYAM P.O., ERUMELI N.VILLAGE.
2. BINU XAVIOUR, EATTIKKAL HOUSE, MUNDAKAYAM P.O., ERUMELI N.VILLAGE.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, KANJIRAPALLY.
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM.
5. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, TRIVANDRUM.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 2082 OF 2006
=====================
Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp
E.A.JAMES @ E.A.VARKEY
BIJU XAVIOUR
BINU XAVIOUR
THE TAHSILDAR, KANJIRAPALLY
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM
THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, TRIVANDRUM
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court