Nikhil Balakrishnan v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC SATURDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2011 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 1630 of 2006(R)
----------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
NIKHIL BALAKRISHNAN, SEMESTER 8, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KALAMASSERY.
BY ADV. SRI.JOICE GEORGE
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KALAMASSERY P.O.
3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY, OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KALAMASSERY P.O.
4. PRASANTH C. JOHN, 8TH SEMESTER, MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KOCHI.
R2 & R3 BY ADV.A.A.ABUL HASSAN, SC,COCOCHIN UNIVERSITY R1 BY ADV.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI, SC,COCHIN UNIVERSITY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DG
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
W.P.(C) No. 1630 OF 2006
Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2011
J U D G M E N T
When the case is called there is no representation on
behalf of the petitioner. The writ petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
ul/-
[true copy]
P.S. to Judge
NIKHIL BALAKRISHNAN
STATE OF KERALA
COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
THE VICE CHANCELLOR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
PRASANTH C. JOHN
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court