Petitioner sought direction to alter vehicle use. Court held application defective and directed petitioner to file fresh application which must be considered within six weeks.
Direction to petitioner to make fresh application for vehicle alteration to be considered by respondent within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933
WP(C).No. 17382 of 2011(W)
---------------------------------------
PETITIONER:
-------------------
RAJI, S/O.K.APPUKUTTAN, RAJ BHAVAN, VAZHAMUTTAM EAST P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK.
RESPONDENTS:
------------------------
1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645.
2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645.
R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. P.A. ANEETHA.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).NO.17382/2011-W:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REGULAR PERMIT DTD. 07/06/2011. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT VALID TILL 07/07/201. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE R.1. DTD. 16/06/2011. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT DTD. 23/06/2011. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 06/04/2011 IN W.P.(C).NO.11090/2011.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Prv.
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
W.P.(C) No. 17382 of 2011 W
Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2011
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Prayer sought in the writ petition is for a direction to consider Ext.P1 application for alteration of a vehicle so as to use it as a light goods vehicle.
pointed out that the application is defective and, therefore, it cannot be considered.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
aks/23/11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to file a fresh application for vehicle alteration after the impugned order quashed the original application.
RAJI
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
