T.G.Rajaram Shenoy, Prop.M/S.Govind Sons v. K.S.E.B.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without providing substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON SATURDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2011 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
WP(C).No. 16035 of 2004(H)
----------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
T.G.RAJARAM SHENOY, PROPRIETOR OF M/S.GOVIND SONS, PLOT NO.50, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, KALAMASSERY.
BY ADV. SRI.B.PARTHASARATHY
SMT.S.LAKSHMY
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. THE SECRETARY, K.S.E.BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PERUMBAVOOR.
3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ERNAKULAM.
4. THE SPECIAL OFFICER (REVENUE), VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM.
R1 TO R4 BY SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM, SENIOR ADVOCATE BY ADV.SRI.S.SHARAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
W.P(C).No.16035 of 2004
Dated this 03rd day of December, 2011
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition
has become infructuous.
Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
(P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE)
Sbna/-
T.G.RAJARAM SHENOY
THE SECRETARY, K.S.E.BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court