In a contempt proceeding, the Court accepted the petitioner's submission that the impugned order had been complied with and dismissed the case, ordering it to be closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2011 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 1202 of 2011(S) ------------------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.29214/2011 Dated 03/11/2011)
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SRI.T.G.SUNIL (PRANAVAM) SRI.K.R.GANESH
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN THE W.P.(C):
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. SHAIJ RAJ T.K.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE © No. 1202 OF 2011 IN W.P.(C)No. 29214 OF 2011
......................................................................... Dated this the 2nd December , 2011
J U D G M E N T
The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that after filing the Contempt case, the order dated 03.11.2011 in W.P.(C) No.29214 of 2011 has already been complied with and there is no further grievance for the petitioners.
In the said circumstance, the Contempt of Court case is closed.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
lk
A. Shajahan and Others
Tom Jose and Another
P.R. Ramachandra Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
