Thankappan v. the R.D.O,Kollam and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on 08/06/2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2011 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1933
WP(C).No. 11953 of 2010(T)
PETITIONER(S):
THANKAPPAN, S/O.LATE PADMANABHAN, PATTARAZHIKATHU VEEDU, THAZHAM CHERRY, CHASTHANNOOR, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.ALEX N.MATHEW (KOLLAM) SRI.H.RAMANAN SRI.JAMES JOSE
RESPONDENT(S):
SR GP SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
W.P.(C).11953/2010
Dated this the 8th day of June, 2011
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge
mrcs
THANKAPPAN
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFOCER
A.K.RADHAMONY
THE VILLAGE OFFICER
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court