This review petition was dismissed because the court found no grounds for review. It held that the petitioner's desire for a re-hearing is impermissible via a review petition.
Review petition dismissed on merits, noting it cannot be used for a re-hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2011 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
RP.No. 866 of 2011()
--------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7566/2006 DATED 28/10/2011
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
--------------------------------------
BEKAL RESORTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
LTD., REPRESENTED BY THEIR MANAGING DIRECTOR BEKAL RESORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION KASARAGOD P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4:
------------------------------------------------------------------
1. KHADEEJA, D/O.ADAM, KOCHANADU HOUSE, KALANAD VILLAGE, KALAND P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
2. COMMISSIONER (LAND REVENUE) , TRIVANDRUM.
3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD.
4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KASARAGOD.
5. TAHSILDAR, KASARAGOD.
BY ADV. V.V.ASOKAN
R4 TO 5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
VK
S. Siri Jagan, J.
R.P. No. 866 of 2011
in
W.P(C) No. 7566 of 2006
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this, the 1st day of December, 2011.
O R D E R
The 5th respondent in W.P(C) No. 7566/2006 seeks review of my judgment dated 28.10.2011.
I do not find any grounds to review my judgment. In fact, what the petitioner wants is a re-hearing of the writ petition, which cannot be done in a review petition. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed.
Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.
Tds/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review petition can be used to seek a re-hearing of the original writ petition.
Bekal Resorts Development Corporation Ltd.
Khadeeja
Commissioner (Land Revenue), Trivandrum
District Collector, Kasaragod
Revenue Divisional Office, Kasaragod
Tahsildar, Kasaragod
S. Siri Jagan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
