Petitioner in contempt case submitted that a resolution produced by the respondent Panchayat rendered further orders unnecessary. The Court, aligning with the submission, closed the contempt case without further adjudication.
The contempt case was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2011 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 1079 of 2011(S)
------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.30742/2010 Dated 10/11/2010 ..........................................................................................................
PETITIONER(S): 2ND PETITIONER IN THE WPC
----------------------------------------
A.Y.CHACKO, S/O.THOMAS YOHANNAN, AGED 47, DRIVER, THANNITHODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THANNITHODE P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, RESIDING AT 'ALAPPATTU HOUSE, THANNITHODE P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA)
RESPONDENT(S): R4 & NOT PARTY IN WPC
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. K.AJITHA, AGED ABOUT 47, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY-INCHARGE, THANNITHODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THANNITHODE P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689699.
2. K.J.JAMES, AGED 43, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), PRESIDENT, THANNITHODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THANNITHODE P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689699.
BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL SMT.AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNAN SRI.K.SIJU
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JM
COC.No. 1079 of 2011
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE A1: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT DT.10-11-2010 IN WPC 30742/2010 & CONNECTED CASES ON THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
ANNEXURE A2: A TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.HC 250/03 DT.11-12-2003 OF THE THANNITHODE PANCHAYATH.
ANNEXURE A3: A TRUE COPY OF THE DISSENTING NOTE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.NIL.
ANNEXURE A4: A TRUE COPY OF THE DISSENTING NOTE OF K.A. KUTTAPPAN, WARD MEMBER NO.6 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.22-9-2011.
ANNEXURE A5: A TRUE COPY OF THE DISSENTING NOTE OF SUMA SIVADASAN WARD MEMBER NO.5 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.22-9-2011.
ANNEXURE A6: A TRUE COPY OF THE DISSENTING NOTE OF LILLY BABU WARD MEMBER NO.8 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.22-9-2011.
ANNEXURE A7: A TRUE COPY OF THE DISSENTING NOTE OF PHILOMINA PAPPACHAN WARD MEMBER NO.11 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.22-9-2011.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :
ANNEXURE R1(A) : COPY OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE THANNITHODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH VIDE RESOLUTION NO. VII DT.22.11.2011.
\TRUE COPY\
PA TO JUDGE
JM
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Con. Case (C) No. 1079 of 2011
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 1st day of December, 2011
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in
view of Annexue R1 (a) produced by the Panchayat, no further orders are necessary in this contempt case.
Accordingly the the contempt of court case is closed.
Sd/-
S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy//
P.A. TO JUDGE
shg/
1ST PETITIONER IN WPC, A.Y.C. CHACKO
1. K.AJITHA
2. K.J.JAMES
S. SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
