Single judge review petition allowed for recall of writ judgment concerning university exam revaluation, on ground of inadvertent error in pleadings regarding the semester affected.
Review petition allowed; judgment in W.P.(C) No.25945 of 2011 recalled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
MONDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2011 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1933
RP.No. 780 of 2011(P)
--------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25945/2011 Dated 29/09/2011
REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
------------------------------------
1. ANILKUMAR E.K., EDATHADAN HOUSE, ALOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2. DENNY PAULSON, ARAKKAL HOUSE, CHELOOR, P.O.IRINJALAKUDA.
3. LINOY C.JOHNY, CHANDRAPONNY HOUSE, NEAR ST.ANTONY'S CHURCH, THRIKKAKARA P.O., KOCHI-21.
4. INDU K.B., KOUMPILLIKKUNNATH HOUSE, P.O.KUZHUR, THRISSUR.
5. ROSE BABU, PAINADATH HOUSE, VATTAPPARAMBU P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.
6. ROSHAN JOSE, KATTLA HOUSE, TANA, MAIN ROAD, IRINJALAKUDA.
BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================
R.P. No.780 of 2011 IN
W.P.(C) NO. 25945 OF 2011
=====================
Dated this the 31st day of October, 2011
O R D E R
Heard both sides.
Having considered the rival submissions and being satisfied that there is a mistake in the judgment, review petition is allowed and the judgment in WP(C) No.25945 of 2011 is recalled.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review its own judgment in the interest of justice due to an error in pleadings.
ANILKUMAR E.K. AND OTHERS
THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
