Hon'ble Justice Antony Dominic dismissed this review petition challenging a WP decree. The Court held that directions in State of Kerala V. George Jacob were fact-specific to the Division Bench case and do not render the impugned order erroneous.
Review Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2011 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1933
RP.No. 206 of 2011()
-------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.12070/2009 Dated 27/01/2011
REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
KUTTAPPAN, PULICKAL HOUSE, POONJAR VADAKKEKARA VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.P.BABU KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V. MANU
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
R.P.No.206/2011 in W.P.(C) NO.12070/09
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 24th day of March, 2011
O R D E R
This review petition has been filed mainly relying on paragraph 4 of the judgment in State of Kerala & Ors. V. George Jacob (2010(3)KHC 381).
Review Petition fails and is dismissed.
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
vi/
WPC.No. /09
:2 :
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the directions in the relied-upon judgment (State of Kerala V. George Jacob) are binding facts or peculiar to the case of the Division Bench.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Kerala & Ors. V. George Jacob (2010(3)KHC 381)Referred¶1
Kuttappan
State of Kerala
District Collector, Kottayam
The Tahasildar, Meenachil
Antony Dominic
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
