Arun V.S. v. the Secretary, Travancore Devaswom and
Case brief
What is this about?
This review petition challenged the order fixing a time limit for compliance with judgment directions. The Court held the petition unnecessary, stating compliance is required within a reasonable time regardless of fixed limits, and that the Impugned decision was to appoint the petitioner within one month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932
RP.No. 16 of 2011()
------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.1378/2010 DATED 03/09/2010
REVIEW PETITIONER(S): / FIRST PETITIONER IN W.A.
ARUN.V.S, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. G. SASEENDRA KURUP, USHUS, KEEZHPEROOR.P.O, KILIMANOOR,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.B.HARISH KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S): / APPELLANTS / RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5 IN W.A.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Review Petition is necessary to fix the time limit for complying with directions in a previous judgment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ARUN.V.S
- respondent
THE SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
Coram
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court