Dismissed

The Central Provident Fund Commr,New Del v. Federal Bank Ltd.

Kerala HC8 Feb 2011RP/1132/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench held that since the underlying writ appeal was dismissed because the court declined to condone delay, not on merits, the petitioner must file a fresh review petition against the Single Judge's judgment if they have a merits-based case. The review petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Review Petition dismissed with observation regarding filing of review against Single Judge's judgment.

The Central Provident Fund Commr,New Del Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932

¶5

RP.No. 1132 of 2010()

¶6

--------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.1720/2010 Dated 11/10/2010 ....................

¶7

REVIEW PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT

¶8

¶9

THE CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIOER, NEW DELHI.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC,EPF ORGANISATION

¶11

RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/RESONDENT

¶12

¶13

FEDERAL BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, ALUVA-683 101,REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.C.V.JOHN.

¶14

SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 001,REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.T.M.SUNNY.

¶15

CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 020, REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.A.RAJMOHAN.

¶16

NEDUNGADI BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, KOZHIKODE 673 001, REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.K.DAMODARAN.

¶17

DHANALAKSHMI BANK LIMITED, CENTRAL OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 001, REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.M.P.S.SHARMA.

¶18

LORD KRISHNA BANK LIMITED, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, KOCHI 682 017, REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.PRAKASH C.CHANDY.

¶19

R.P.NO.1132/2010

¶20

BIJU.P.L, DRIVER CUM PEON,CATHOLIC

¶21

SYRIAN BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE,THRISSUR 680 020.

¶22

MINI C.V,TYPIST CUM CLERK,CATHOLIC

¶23

SYRIAN BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE,THRISSUR 680 020.

¶24

N.C.JOSHY,SUSTAFF,DHANALAKSHMI BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 001.

¶25

T.V.VAIDYANATHAN,DHANALAKSHMI BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 001.

¶26

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,MINISTRY OF LABOUR, SRAM MANTHRALAYA, NEW DELHI.

¶27

MR.SAJI VARGHESE, ASG

¶28

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶29

C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.

R.P.No.1132 of 2010

WA No.1720 of 2010

Dated, this the 8^th day of February, 2011

¶34

O R D E R

¶35

Ramachandran Nair, J.

¶36

This Review Petition is filed challenging the merit of the decision taken. Since we have declined to condone delay, the Writ Appeal got dismissed not on merits but on account of order declined to condone delay. If the petitioner has a case on merits, it is for the petitioner to file review petition against the judgment of the learned Single Judge.

¶37

This Review Petition is dismissed with the above observation.

¶38

(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)

¶39

(K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE)

¶40

The Central Provident Fund Commr,New Del v. Federal Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Central Provident Fund Commr,New Del v. Federal Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uthradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma Vs Union of India

Jainulavudheen Vs State of Kerala

B.Radhamani Amma Vs Union of India & Others

M/S. Orange Group of Companies, Rep.by Vs the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tri

Arun V.S. Vs the Secretary, Travancore Devaswom and

Anju Vijayan Vs High Court of Kerala-Rep;by Registrar