Biju Kumar v. Vasu
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition admitted allowing petitioner to be heard in underlying writ petition as additional respondent; matter remanded for final disposal after hearing all parties including review petitioner and filing of statements.
What did the court decide?
The review petition is allowed; review petitioner is arrayed as additional respondent No.4 in the writ petition; writ petition to be disposed of afresh after hearing all parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
TUESDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2011 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1932
RP.No. 146 of 2011() -------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.225/2011 ....................
REVIEW PETITIONER/3RD PARTY:
BIJU KUMAR, S/O BHASKARAN, BIJU BHAVAN, POST KODUMAN, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
- VASU, S/O PADMANABHAN,
- PUTHUPARAMBIL MELETHIL,
- ANGADIKKAL VILLAGE,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BIJU KUMAR
- respondent
VASU
- respondent
K.G.KAMALASANAN
- respondent
CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA
- respondent
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODUMON, PATHANAMTHITTA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court