This single-judge regular first appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant had filed a memo representing an out-of-court settlement and sought permission to withdraw the appeal, which was granted.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1933
RFA.No. 70 of 2008() -------------------OS.166/2003 of SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM .................... APPELLANT (S):PLAINTIFF: ---------------------------------------
K.RAMAKRISHNAN ,AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. K.SANKARANKUTTY, RESIDING AT K.P.L.P.QUARTERS KANNIYAMPURAM AMSOM,DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S): DEFENDANT: -------------------------------------------VENUGOPALAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. KONATTU MEENAKSHY AMMA, KANNIYAMPURAM AMSOM THOTTAKKARA DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.M.JOSEPH & A. M. SHAFFIQUE, JJ.
R.F.A.No.70 of 2008-A
Dated, this the 17th day of November, 2011
J U D G M E N T
K.M.Joseph, J.
Appellant has filed a memo dated 15th October, 2011
stating that the matter has been settled out of court and he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. Recording the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It is open to the appellant to seek refund of court fee and we leave open that question.
(K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE.
JUDGE.
MS
K. RAMAKRISHNAN
VENUGOPALAN
K.M. JOSEPH
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
