Fathima v. P.v.Paulose
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala discharged a Rent Control Revision without examining merits because the subject matter building was acquired by the Government for road widening, rendering the proceedings infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 18TH MAGHA 1932
RCRev..No. 557 of 2005() -----------------------RCA.10/2005 IN I.A.180/05 OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, N. PARAVUR RCP.4/2000 of MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
REVISION PETITIONER/IST RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
FATHIMA, D/O.MAMMU HAJI, AISHA MANZIL, PERUMBAVOOR KARA, PERUMBAVOOR VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT THEKKILATHIL HOUSE,DEVARKOVIL, DESOM, KAYAKKODI VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.S.VINOD BHAT
RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT/RESPONDENTS.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
FATHIMA, D/O.MAMMU HAJI
- respondent
P.V.PAULOSE
- respondent
PAPPU
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court