Dismissed
K.Radha v. Chandrika
Kerala HCRCRev./348/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The revision petition under the Kerala Rent Control Act was dismissed because the court recorded that the building had been surrendered to the landlord, rendering the proceedings infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT :
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE &
¶4
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
¶5
MONDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 18TH MAGHA 1932
¶6
RCRev..No. 348 of 2006()
¶7
-----------------------RCA.79/2002 OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, THRISSUR RCP.88/2000 OF THE RENT CONTROL COURT,THRISSUR
¶8
REVISION PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1,2 & 3/APPELLANT
¶10
- K. RADHA, W/O.LATE PALATTU PARAMESWARAN, CHEMBORKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
¶11
- RENJITH, AGED 15, S/O. 1ST REVISION PETITIONER AND LATE PARAMESWARAN CHEMBORKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
¶12
- MINOR RATHEESH, AGED 17, S/O. 1ST REVISION PETITIONER AND LATE PARAMESWARAN CHEMBORKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
K. RADHA
- respondent
RENJITH
- respondent
MINOR RATHEESH
- respondent
CHANDRIKA
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court