of 1965, which was highlighted before the court below. In the revision memorandum also it is above bar which is urged more prominently. It is trite by decisions of this Court that it is open to a landlord to file a rent control petition invoking the ground under section 11(3) even after an earlier petition filed by him invoking the same ground is dismissed, provided there has been change in circumstance. It should be noticed that it is about 20 years after the filing of the earlier RCP that the present RCP is filed. The authorities below have found that the circumstances attending on the landlord have changed. At the time of filing of the earlier RCP, the landlord was doing contract works for the Government. Presently the evidence would show that he has no work or avocation for life. The same itself is a major change in the circumstance attending on the landlord. In short, we do not find any illegality, irregularity or impropriety as envisaged by Section 20 of Act 2 of 1965 in the concurrent eviction order passed by the Rent Control
