Raji v. Prakasan
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
TUESDAY, THE 3RD MAY 2011 / 13TH VAISAKHA 1933
OP (FC).No. 1575 of 2011(R) --------------------------GOP.1096/2010 of FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR ....................
(S): PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
----------------------------------------RAJI, AGED 33 YEARS, D/O. NARAYANAN, MANGOLI PARAMBIL, KURICHIKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) SMT.R.RAJITHA
RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER -------------------------
PRAKASAN, S/O. SREEDHARAN, VAMPILLIKUNNAN HOUSE, RAMAVARMAPURAM, VILVATTOM VILLAGE, THRISSUR- 680 001.
THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
O.P.(F.C.) No.1575 of 2011
Dated 3rd May, 2011.
J U D G M E N T
Sankaran, J.
The petitioner apprehends that the Family Court will pass an order granting interim custody of the children to the respondent, who is the father of the children. The Family Court has not passed any such order. The apprehension voiced by the petitioner cannot be entertained at this stage. Reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge any order that may be passed by the Family Court, the Original Petition is closed.
K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE.
M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE.
tgs
Raji
Prakasan
K.T.Sankaran
M.L.Joseph Francis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court