Shoby George v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition, the Kerala High Court, via S. Siri Jagan, J., directed respondents (bailiff/bank) to keep repossession steps in abeyance for one week to allow the petitioner to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal for interim orders regarding Section 17 proceedings initiated under SARFAESI Act.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondents to keep impugned orders in abeyance for one week to enable petitioner to approach the Tribunal for interim orders.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2011 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1933
OP (DRT).No. 4118 of 2011()
-----------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------
SHOBY GEORGE, SON OF C.J.GEORGE, AGED 48 YEARS, CHIRAKEEKARAN HOUSE, 7/135, PUTHOOR ROAD, KOPPAM, PALAKKAD - 2.
BY ADV. SRI.LEO GEORGE
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant a breathing time to the petitioner to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal for interim orders against动起来 possession.
Whether to direct respondents to keep repossession proceedings in abeyance pending Tribunal's decision on stay application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shoby George
- respondent
Union Bank of India, Palakkad Branch
- respondent
Authorised Officer, Union Bank of India, Palakkad Branch
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court