The Original Petition before this Court was dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the petitioner's rights to challenge the impugned order in any appeal.
[ ]Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 13TH MAGHA 1932
OP(C).No. 436 of 2011(O)
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED IN IA.83,84,85/2011 IN OS.86/2006 OF SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA
PETITIONER : DEFENDANT
BALANKUTTAN PILLAI, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.LATE NEELAKANDAN PILLAI, KAROOR PADETTATHIL, KATTANAM, BHARANICKAVU, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL
RESPONDENT: PLAINTIFF
MANU PARTHAN, S/O.PARTHAN, VRINDAVANATHIL, CHIRAKKADAVAM MURI, KAYAMKULAM-690502.
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
-----------------------------------------------------O.P.(C). NO. 436 OF 2011 O
-----------------------------------------------------Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2011
JUDGMENT
After arguing the Original Petition in detail, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Original Petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the correctness or otherwise of the order impugned in the Appeal from the decree, if any. The Original Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, reserving any other legal right of the petitioner.
(K.T.SANKARAN) Judge
ahz/
BALANKUTTAN PILLAI
MANU PARTHAN
K.T.SANKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
