Usha v. Shaila
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge dismissed the cross-review petition as not pressed with liberty to appeal. The original petition for expeditious disposal was closed as no further directions were required.
What did the court decide?
Cross-review petition dismissed; Original petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
FRIDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2011 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1933
OP(C).No. 1195 of 2011(O)
OS.33/1997 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, KODUNGALLUR
PETITIONER:
USHA, D/O. RAMAKRISHNAN PANICKER, CHERAYIPADINJARAKKARA HOUSE, ALA DESOM, S.N. PURAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR SRI.A.S.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR
RESPONDENT: ---------------
SHAILA, D/O.BALAKRISHNA PANICKER, CHERAYIPADINJAKKARA HOUSE, ALA DESOM, SREENARANAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR - 680 664.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue directions for expeditious disposal of the final decree application.
Whether to dispose of the cross-review petition and original petition for citation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Usha
- respondent
Shaila
Coram
K.T. Sankaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court