In this Land Acquisition Appeal, the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissed the appeal filed by the State of Kerala. The court approved the enhancement of compensation due to a decision in a similar case (L.A.A. No. 1145/2010) and held that the enhancement granted under the impugned judgment could be upheld. The appeal was therefore rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 22ND MAGHA 1932
LA.App..No. 152 of 2011() ------------------------LAR.408/2007 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM ....................
APPELLANT(S): APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.1 IN LAR
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.T.T.JOSEPHINA
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANTS AND RESPONDENT NO.2 IN LAR
(PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT,
P.B.NO.5424, VIKAS BHAVAN.P.O., MASCUT SQUARE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.)
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.
L.A.A.No. 152 OF 2011
Dated this the 11th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT
Pius C.Kuriakose, J.
Having regard to the decision taken by this court in L.A.A. No.1145/2010, which was another case pertaining to the same acquisition but in respect of land in a different category, we feel that the enhancement presently granted under the impugned judgment can be approved. The appeal is dismissed.
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE
dpk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the enhancement of compensation granted under the impugned judgment is approvable in the same category as L.A.A. No. 1145/2010.
Whether the appeal filed against the impugned judgment should be allowed or dismissed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
L.A.A. No. 1145/2010Followed¶27
1 provisions across 1 enactments
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
SULOCHANA
SASIDHARAN NAIR
LALITHA
SREEKANTAN NAIR
P.PARTHIPAN NAIR ALIAS JAYAN
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
