This single-line contempt order accepted the petitioner's declaration that a previously directed license was issued, resulting in the closure of the contempt case without further proceedings. No substantive legal principle was elucidated.
The Contempt Case is closed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
THURSDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 31ST BHADRA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 969 of 2011(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.13079/2011 Dated 23/05/2011 ....................
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
SUNNY PAUL.P., S/O.PAULOSE, AGED 60, PULINATT HOUSE, KUZHOOR KARA, IRAPURAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE
RESPONDENT/IST RESPONDENT IN WP(C):
P.I.SHEIK PAREED, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, NOW WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN:682 030.
BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER, SRI.M.R. SABU
THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON,J
Contempt Case (Civil)No. 696 OF 2011
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
direction given by this Court as per judgment dated 23.05.2011 in W.P.(C) No.13079 of 2011 is now complied with and the licence was issued on 18.09.2011.
In the said circumstance, this Court does not find it necessary to proceed with the matter any further. The Contempt Case is closed accordingly.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE
ttb
Sunny Paul.P.
P.I. Sheik Pareed
P.R.Ramachandram Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
