Petitioner filed a contempt petition challenging non-compliance of W.P.(C)No.8309/2011. Government Pleader submitted prior order satisfies directions. Court closed contempt matter, finding no need to proceed further.
Contempt matter closed as respondents complied with prior directions and no further proceedings were found necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
MONDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2011 / 27TH ASHADHA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 686 of 2011(S)
------------------------------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
--------------------------------------
K.M.RAMANI, W/O.LATE K.SIVASANKARAN NAIR, AGED 60 YEARS, JAYALAKSHMI NIVAS, THEKKETHARA, AYLUR P.O.,PALAKKAD
BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR SRI.LEO GEORGE SMT.BABITHA THAMBI
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT
------------------------------------------------
G.VIJAYAKUMAR, WORKING AS ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, CHITTOOR,PALAKKAD
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASHREE
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
dmb
Con.Case(C).No. 686 of 2011
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:-
ANX.A1:COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD 15.2.2011 ANX.A2:COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C)NO.8309/2011 DTD 17.3.2011 ANX.A3:COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF RE-SURVEY, PALAKKAD DTD 25.5.2011
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:- NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
dmb
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
------------------------------------------COC No.686 of 2011
Dated this the 18th day of July 2011
J U D G M E N T
The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submits that the directions given by this Court as per judgment dtd.17.3.2011 in W.P.(C)No.8309 of 2011 have already been complied with, by passing appropriate orders by the Tahsildar on 8.7.2011 and that the matter is being communicated to the petitioner.
In the above circumstance, this Court does not find it necessary to proceed further. This contempt matter is closed accordingly.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
Jvt
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings should be closed on compliance of previous directions?
If the matter is closed, what is its legal status?
K.M. Ramani
G. Vijayakumar
Government Pleader Smt.M.J. Rajashree
P.R. Ramachandran Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
