Anil Kumar K.A. v. Mr.T.C.Mathew
Case brief
What is this about?
A contest matter filed alleging violation of a previous judgment regarding the conduct of cricket league matches. The Court examined pleadings and affidavits to determine if the respondent committed wilful disobedience.
What did the court decide?
The contempt matter was closed without expressing anything with regard to the rival contentions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
TUESDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2011 / 24TH JYAISHTA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 444 of 2011(S)
--------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32410/2009 DATED 11/03/2011
PETITIONERS/WRIT PETITIONERS
--------------------------------------------------
1. ANIL KUMAR. K.A, AGE 40 YEARS, S/O.ANIYAN. K.K, BUDOLINE CRICKET ACADEMY, NOMINEE TO TDCA, KUNDEPARAMBIL HOUSE, ANIL VIHAR, UMANAGAR STREET NO.10, KOLAZHY P.O.,THRISSUR-10.
2. SASIDHARAN. M.C, AGE 34 YEARS, S/O.CHANDRAN, FRIENDS ARTS & SPORTS CLUB, NOMINEE TO TDCA, MELAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O. POOTHOLE, THRISSUR-04.
3. LEO VINCENT, AGE 37 YEARS, S/O.VINCENT, ULBAV ARTS AND SPORTS CLUB, NOMINEE TO TDCA, THALAKOTTUR HOUSE, CHELAKOTTUKARA, THOTTATHIL LANE, THRISSUR-5.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is a contumacious act by the respondent in violation of the Court's judgment regarding the conduct of league matches under the supervision of Mr. Haridas.
Whether the refusal to take a decision for conducting league matches constitutes wilful disobedience.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ANIL KUMAR. K.A and others
- respondent
MR.T.C. MATHEW
Coram
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court